by T. Austin-Sparks
Chapter 1 - The Quest of the Eyes of Flame
Reading: Revelation
1:1-20; 2:1.
By way of a brief introductory word let us focus your attention upon what we feel to be the Lord's concern with His people at this time.
In the second and third chapters of the Book of the Revelation we have the Lord's survey of the seven churches. As those eyes that are as a flame of fire peer into the inner spiritual state and lay bare the condition - analyse, dissect, separate, place on the two sides of debit and credit, and form and pass their final verdict - we see one thing to be at issue with regard to them all. There may be particular differences in them; the aspects may vary; the elements may be very different: yet when all has been surveyed and gathered together it is to establish but one fact, namely, the presence or absence of that which, from the Lord's standpoint, constitutes justification in the continuance of the Lord's full committal to anything which claims to represent Him. The issue for every one of these churches was whether, under the Lord's permission, they could remain as true witnesses, and whether they could continue as really representing Him. The Lord had them before Him - shall we say, had them in His hand - and was determining whether He could keep them or whether He would have to put them away; whether He would have to "remove the lampstand out of its place" (Revelation 2:5), or whether it could abide with His full approval. So that the question was clearly one of continuing in relation to the Lord's intended purpose or of losing its position. We have seen bodies cross the sky at night, coming from afar, gaining in brilliance, it seemed, as they came nearer, flashing on their way, and then disappearing altogether from view in the darkness of the night. Here are "stars" brought in by the eternal counsels of God, flashing in with the glory of His grace, some of them to cease to fulfil those counsels.
The question concerning every instrumentality raised up by God in relation to His purpose is: How far can He go on with it? It is evident that there are things which do not justify Him in wholly supporting some instrumentalities which He originally raised up and used. These letters make those things clear.
In the first place, the fact that God originally raised up an instrumentality, that it came from Him and was His work initially, does not justify Him in keeping it indefinitely. That is made quite clear. We should take serious account of the fact that, because God raised up a thing, it does not mean that He must of necessity keep that thing right through unconditionally, that is, no matter what its state or character may be eventually or in the course of time. Further, the fact that an instrument has had a wonderful history of devotion to Him and has at some time been a very real and full expression of His grace and power, does not resolve itself into a claim upon Him, and He does not regard Himself as under any obligation to preserve it indefinitely. But we have to press the point still further. Because at any given time many commendable things are to be seen in an instrumentality, which the Lord Himself may praise - and there may be not a few such things - nevertheless, this record shows that even they do not justify God in preserving it in its former place; even the presence of such comparatively good things does not mean that He may never consider putting them out of their original place, or that He is bound to refrain from doing so. There are many things which continue to exist and serve a purpose, but have lost their place in their original value to the Lord.
That is a very thorough sifting of everything. It might
be thought that if God raised up a thing, if it came in
the first place from His own hand; if God had used it and
blessed it; if it had shown the features and
characteristics of His grace and His love; if that
instrumentality still had in it many commendable things
which God, looking with His eyes as a flame, could
approve of, surely that is enough to argue for its
continuance in the fullness of His blessing? You
understand that we are speaking about instrumentalities.
We are not speaking about souls. We are not dealing with
the question of salvation, but with that of vocation.
What, then, justifies the Lord in preserving and going on
with any such instrumentality? We must look to see what
motivated Him when He brought it into being, what was in
His mind and in His heart. We shall find all we need to
know from the very description of the instrumentality
itself. In the passage to which we have referred it is
called a lampstand - "seven golden lampstands"
(R.V.M.). Our knowledge of the Word gives us much light
upon what that means, and the Old Testament in particular
comes at once to our help, for whether it be the
candlestick in the Tabernacle, or the candlestick all of
gold shown to Zechariah (Zechariah 4:2), we know that in
both cases there was represented the living expression of
the Holy Spirit's energies. Take the candlestick all of
gold. We remember the pattern of it, with its seven bowls
and seven golden pipes; and the oil being emptied out
from the living olive trees through the pipes into the
bowls, to provide the resource for the light. It is a
very complete, very comprehensive illustration, and it is
something that is living. At one end there is a living
fountain or spring. The prophet does not say that there
were cisterns, tanks, some man-made receptacle of oil,
but living trees, and oil being poured continually, ever
fresh - warm from the arteries of that living organism,
as it were - into the candlestick burning with its
steady, undying light, a light which does not vary, which
does not go out, which is maintained at full strength
continually.
THE UNDYING FLAME
It is the testimony of
an unfailing, undying, all-sufficient life; the testimony
of a life which is not abstract, not something stored up,
but something which is coming all the time from an
inexhaustible stream, a mighty, glorious life. As the
light burns, it is a constant declaration of victory, and
that, a victory over death, which would seek to smother
the flame. It burns in the midst of surrounding death, a
continuous declaration that death has no power to quench
it.
To come back to the Book of Revelation: What is it, and
what is it that alone justifies God in maintaining any
instrumentality in full relation to Himself and
His purpose? It is not that the instrumentality has many
good things. It is not that it had its origin with God.
It is not that it has a great history, a great past, a
good tradition. It is not that it has a name, a
reputation, the name of its more glorious days. It is
that there is today the same undying flame of
Divine life in it, a testimony against the power of death
all around. That is God's justification.
You notice that in relation to the seven golden
lampstands there is reference to the seven Spirits of
God, meaning spiritual fullness, and to Jesus Christ the
Faithful Witness. He is identified with these lamps. He
is in the midst of them, closely associated with them.
They were called into being in order that they might be
an abiding testimony to the Lord Himself as the Faithful
Witness, the Living One, in the power of the Spirit of
God.
When we come to analyse the state of these churches, we
find that in five of them, at least, there is a variety
of elements, each of which is an expression of something
that is a contradiction to the Holy Spirit, a
contradiction to the Spirit of Life. When such a thing is
found amongst the Lord's people - within the
vessel, the instrument - it constitutes an element of
death and provides Satan with his foothold, and all
unconsciously for the most part among those people the
testimony is contradicted.
The point is this. Satan will resort to anything - his
methods and his means are numerous - to get some foothold
for death in a Divinely-constituted instrumentality, so
that the thing becomes a contradiction right at its very
centre. It has a name; it has good works; it has many
things which even the Lord Himself cannot judge because
they are good; but the vital thing by which alone the
Lord can be justified in maintaining that instrumentality
in its former position has been countered. It is not a
question of what there once was of good and whether it
still flourishes today, but rather: Has the Lord that
central, basic, essential, indispensable thing for which
He has ever raised up His instrumentalities, whether
individuals or companies, and brought them into
relationship with Himself, that for which He apprehended
them, that which was intended to be their specific
vocation? It is not a matter of its bulk, size, or
earthly quantity, but its intrinsic quality.
Let us look again at the particular case in point (Rev.
2:1 et seq). The Lord is saying: "From whence thou
hast fallen." "The first works."
"Think again, reconsider, and change back"
("Repent"). "I will remove thy lampstand
out of its place." To whom does He so address
Himself? To Ephesus. Ephesus! Only thirty years before
had Ephesus received that deposit of revelation above
which there is nothing to excel in the New Testament,
that wonderful disclosure of the eternal counsels and
calling of God which came to bear the name 'Ephesians'.
Oh, the tragedy of Ephesus! Time was when it could be
said that, through her, "all Asia" was
affected. Her intrinsic value registered over that wide
area.
What did the Lord mean by removing her lampstand out
of its place? Not necessarily that by one stroke what
was there would be wiped out or blotted out. Not a
geographical removal or a literal extinction. Ephesus and
its church went on for many years. But its essentially spiritual
position in the "vocation wherewith it was
called" was lost. It became something else. It may
have grown numerically. It might have been accepted in
Ephesus. Its "good works" may have remained and
been many. But its spiritual measure, intrinsic virtue,
and resources for the Church beyond its locality were
lost. "Its place" spiritually could be
removed without its temporal and material location being
touched. Is this not the sad history of so many things
which had a beginning and went on in spiritual power and
spontaneous effectiveness for some years, but eventually
lost their spiritual place and position in the
"whole counsel of God"? In many cases, both of
individual and personal and of collective ministries, we
have to say: 'They have lost out'; 'they do not
correspond to their beginning'. Many places which once
were centres of far-reaching influence, while still
existing, only do so on an earlier tradition. Many
ministries under which we felt the Divine impact have -
with the extra tragic factor of insensibility to the fact
- lost that Divine unction. Is it expansion without
commensurate spiritual resource? Is it popularity and
acceptance which has robbed of the sense of crisis and
urgency? Has the vision faded because of success or
adversity? Have elements of contradiction found a
loophole somewhere and worked like secret leaven to
corrupt? Whatever it might be, there it is, and such a
thing is on record in the Word of God as a warning for
all time that this is the peril which besets anything
which God raised up as a lamp of true testimony. Some of
us inwardly weep as, in our own lifetime, we have seen
this tragedy in servants of God, in movements and
instrumentalities which have lost out. Spiritual pride is
a major and certain cause of such disaster. When the
'Institution', 'Mission', 'Centre', or any thing
becomes the object of talk and gratification, and it is
not the Lord in growing fullness, then the days of the
Lord's full committal to it are numbered.
We have all been apprehended of Jesus Christ, and there
has been a purpose behind that apprehending. We have not
been apprehended just to be saved. Our salvation is but
basic and introductory to something very much more. The
Lord gathers His own together to form them into a
corporate vessel of Divine purpose. He raises up such
instrumentalities from time to time; but whether it be
individuals or whether it be companies, one constant
danger is that the 'essential thing' in the Divine
thought in raising it up, in apprehending that vessel,
should somehow be lost while many other things may
continue.
THE LORD'S STANDARD OF JUDGMENT
One inclusive thing
arises from this survey of the churches. It is that the
Lord deals with every life or vessel in the light of His
specific purpose for it, and not of its general
usefulness. These chapters would never have been written
if the Lord were simply taking this view: 'Well, this
vessel is not wholly bad; there is much yet of value
here; it has not altogether gone away from Me; therefore
I must look after it and support it, preserve it, and
commit Myself wholly to it'; but the Lord is not doing
that. We may be thankful to the Lord for anything that
there is in this world which is good and is of Himself,
and as we ourselves go into it we are grateful that the
Lord should have any witness in a world like this; but,
oh, so far as His own people are concerned, so far as the
Church is concerned, that never satisfies Him. Of that we
may be quite sure.
Why are we saying this? Because so many people say:
'Well, you know, you are trying to get something so
perfect! Why not be satisfied with what is commendable
about the Church today? Take it as it is! Accept it and
be thankful that there are so many who belong to the Lord
and bear His name in a world like this!' I find that this
record does not allow of that. God knows that we are
grateful that there are believers in this world, be they
but poor ones. You cannot go abroad in a world like this
and see its state, its Godlessness, its sinfulness,
without being thankful to find even a very poor specimen
of a believer who has some love in his heart for the
Lord. You are thankful for the smallest thing that speaks
of Him. Oh, but when you come to see God's purpose, when
you see that what He has designed for His Church is the
occasion of His call, His choosing in Christ, you can
never be satisfied with nominalism, or with general
goodness.
When you come to a word like this you find it taking you
right on - if you like to call it 'extreme' you may -
right on to the end. It tells you quite plainly that
whether there be a great past, a great history of Divine
blessing and usefulness, a great reputation for good
works, and many good things still obtaining, none of
these things is an adequate justification for the Lord to
commit Himself wholly to that vessel, for He has some
reservations. He must have questions unless the purpose
for which that vessel was raised up is being fulfilled.
None of the New Testament Letters would have been written
if the Lord was satisfied with the merely nominal. There
has never been anything perfect but the serious matter is
that of our attitude to "not having yet
attained". Paul said: "I am not yet perfect,
but...", and very much hung upon that
"but". These churches in Revelation had
accepted their imperfect condition.
THE NOMINAL IS ULTIMATELY REJECTED
For what was the Church
raised up? I do not believe that the Lord originally
thought of having a general Church, and then a special
one within it; a general mass of believers, and then a
company called 'overcomers' in the midst. That has never
been the design of God. It is what we might call an
emergency state of things, and is essential because of
general failure. It seems to me that the very word
'overcomers' presupposes that there is failure somewhere.
The Lord's purpose for all His Church, as a vessel
- which nevertheless may only be realized in a few - is
that it should maintain the testimony of a life which has
conquered death, and will conquer death right to the end.
It is a life question.
The Lord Jesus is constituted the great Witness upon the
ground of the power of God which was exercised in Him
when He was raised from the dead. Remember that the
testimony of Jesus is always related to His being raised
from the dead; that is, that He lives by a power which
has conquered death. He is the Life on that ground, on
that basis, in that sense, and those whom the New
Testament approves as witnesses to Jesus are not those
who talk the truth about Him, but are witnesses of His
resurrection - that is, of course, in a spiritual way
- witnesses to Christ as risen. The New Testament's
testimony of Jesus is that God raised Him from the dead
and that He is alive for evermore. That is the essence of
the testimony. Thus the whole question resolves itself
into one of testimony in life, a testimony of life. It is
not a testimony of doctrine in the first place, but a
testimony of life. Is the flame burning as at the
beginning, witnessing that Jesus lives and is triumphant,
even over the dark, deadly background of this world? That
is the question for the Lord's people; the question for
your life and for mine, and for every collective
instrumentality.
As we proceed we shall see a great deal of what that
means. For the moment we simply focus our thoughts upon
the issue. I have no doubt in my heart as to what the
issue of our time is. I trust that in this matter we may
rightly claim to be of the tribe of Issachar, so to
speak, to know what the time is saying and what Israel
ought to do. I have not the slightest shadow of a doubt
but that the issue of our day, of this hour in the
Church's history is, more than ever, the issue of life
and death in a spiritual sense. Are you not more and more
experiencing that awful sapping of your very vitality,
that draining of your life, that exhausting of your
energy, perhaps especially in relation to prayer? Is it
not true that it often requires a supreme effort to pray,
and to get through when you have started to pray? You
need energizing from a source other than that of your own
natural energies in this matter, and that increasingly
so. There is a strange, deep, terrible sapping of
vitality, mental and physical vitality as well as
spiritual. Spiritual people, at least, know something of
that. And lying at the back of it is the final
conflict of this age. It is the spiritual issue of
life and death.
The Lord would say to us something about that at this
time, and we have to direct our eyes in the the way of
the Lord's thought to the great issue which is at stake
for His people. I trust that we shall know that He is not
only making us aware of it and not only warning us about
the perils of it, but that He comes mightily to our aid
and shows us what is on our side in the battle.
In keeping with T. Austin-Sparks' wishes that what was freely received should be freely given and not sold for profit, and that his messages be reproduced word for word, we ask if you choose to share these messages with others, to please respect his wishes and offer them freely - free of any changes, free of any charge (except necessary distribution costs) and with this statement included.