In the thirteenth chapter of the
Gospel by Matthew, which we may have open before
us by way of reminder, we find the operation of the
Kingdom illustrated in a sevenfold way.
THE
PARABLES OF THE KINGDOM
I do not propose to
attempt an exposition of that sevenfold way, but will
simply lift out from the chapter the salient features of
the operation of the sovereign rule of God. We have here
that operation illustrated, in what have come to be
called 'the parables of the Kingdom'. That is the title
which men have given to them, but it is well to remember
that the title which the Lord Jesus gave to them was 'the
mysteries of the Kingdom'.
THE
KEY TO THE PARABLES
These parables, or
mysteries, of the Kingdom of Heaven are really impossible
of understanding, except in the light of the definition
of the Kingdom which we have just given - that is, as the
sovereign rule of God. If you interpret them as
indicating primarily a realm or nature, then you have
gone beyond their warrant, and you will most certainly
get into confusion. Few parts of the New Testament have
been more subject to controversy than these parables. The
various interpretations that have been given to them have
divided students and teachers into irreconcilable
schools. We shall see something of that as we go along.
It is therefore necessary to discover the key to the
parables, in order to be saved from this confusion and
contradiction; and that key undoubtedly lies in the
definition of the Kingdom as THE SOVEREIGN RULE OF GOD.
Let me repeat: I am not embarking upon an exposition of
these parables, but seeking to get at something of very
great importance and value to ourselves at this time.
THE
PARABLE OF THE SOWER
The first is what is
called the parable of the sower (vv. 18-23). The Lord
Jesus said that the seed is the word of the Kingdom.
"When anyone heareth the word of the kingdom",
He said. Now re-translate that as 'the word of the
sovereign rule'. The word of the sovereign rule has gone
forth. What is the result? Very largely failure. The
success in the positive sense is very limited,
cornparatively - some thirty, some sixty, some a
hundredfold. You see how impossible it is to impart to
the Kingdom the idea of a realm or a nature. That would
imply that within the realm where God rules you have very
largely failure. But that is not the teaching of the
parable. The teaching of the parable is this. The word of
the sovereign rule is sent forth, like seed; and, no
matter if there is a large failure in response and
reaction to that word, God is successful in the end with
a body that is productive of that which is implicit in
the Word.
Yes, man may fail. He
may receive apparently with gladness, and then it may all
come to nothing. He may respond in a way, and seem to be
going to turn out all right - and then, because of
difficulties and adversities, just fade out. But let
there be failure, disappointment, breakdown: no matter -
God gets something in His sovereignty. There is something
that this sovereign government of God secures. You see,
this is a tremendous word of the sovereignty for
labourers. You labour, you scatter, you give, you work,
you travail; but, if it is the word of the sovereign rule
in very truth, it cannot ultimately fail. There may be
much disappointment, but there will be an issue which
answers to the intention of the One who gave it. Very
simple: but you see how important it is to recognise the
all-governing law of the sovereign rule which cannot,
fully and finally, ultimately be defeated. A great deal
may seem to argue that the labour is in vain; but the
Lord is saying here in this parable: 'No! When it is a
word of the rule of God, it cannot ultimately return
wholly void; there will be something resulting from it.'
The sovereignty is governing.
THE
WHEAT AND THE TARES
The next is that
commonly called the parable of the wheat and the tares -
the darnel (vv. 23-30). Here from the word the thought
passes to persons. It is not the word that is now sown -
it is persons that are sown. Children of the Kingdom are
sown in the earth, and then by night the enemy comes and
sows his own children, children of his kingdom. They are
the children of the Devil. His method is suitable to his
object. His object being completely to nullify what is of
God, his method is to imitate it. That is a wile of that
evil wisdom of Satan - imitation children of God mixed in
with the true children of God in order to nullify. The
workers are represented as coming to the owner of the
field and telling him what they have found there, and he
says, 'Ah, an enemy has done this.' And they say, 'What
would you have us do? Shall we pluck up this other
thing?'
He replies: 'No - let
the sovereignty have its way! Let them both grow
together, and the sovereignty, the rule of Heaven, will
progressively make very clear which is which, and the end
will be an easy and a safe course. If you start doing
that now, you have not got the wisdom of Heaven to
discriminate. It is not your business, and you have not
the faculty or capacity, to disentangle this deep work of
the Devil, by trying to mark out what is true and what is
an imitation. That is not your job, and you are not
qualified to do it. Only Heaven can do that. So let it go
on, and the sovereign rule will make manifest what is of
itself, and what is otherwise.'
It is the sovereign
rule that is going to solve and settle this whole
problem. You cannot say that the Kingdom of Heaven or the
Kingdom of God is like that which is pictured in this
parable - an awful mixture. It is not. The Kingdom of
God, the Kingdom of Heaven, is one thing, and only the
sovereign rule of God can bring out into clearness what
is of God.
But that will happen as
we go on. We can trust the sovereign rule. That is very
practical: it works like this. There are those who are
truly of God, of Heaven; and then there are those who
come in - who perhaps sing the hymns, use the
phraseology, carry on the same way, associate with those
of the Kingdom; but there is a difference. Deep down,
they are really "not of us". They are just
imitations; they are not real, not the genuine thing. We
may discern, as these men discerned, that there is
something here that is not the same thing, something that
is foreign, that is alien and strange. What are we going
to do? Had we better turn them out, tell them to go?
No, no! Go on long
enough, and they will go of themselves. The two things
will be self-manifested, and it will be quite easy in the
long run. "They went out from us", said John,
"...that they might be made manifest that they all
are not of us" (1 John 2:19). This is a heavenly
principle, you see - there is a manifestation. It is
difficult to endure patiently those people who you sense
have not, as we say, the root of the matter in them - who
are just camp-followers. But, as with the mixed multitude
that left Egypt with Israel, time and testing will find
them out. This is the way if the Kingdom, the
sovereignty, operates, and it calls for much faith, and
much patience.
THE
MUSTARD SEED
The parable of the
mustard seed (vv. 31, 32) is one of the most difficult of
all, and one that has perhaps been the occasion of some
of the worst interpretations and teachings. "The
kingdom of heaven is like unto a grain of mustard
seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field: which
indeed is less than all seeds; but when it is grown, it
is greater than the herbs, and becometh a tree, so that
the birds of the heaven come and lodge in the
branches." Do you really believe, in the light
of all these other parables and of His whole teaching,
that the Lord Jesus said, 'This is the Kingdom of Heaven
- the Kingdom of Heaven is like that'? If the common and
popular interpretation is to be accepted, then we are
involved in some real difficulties. Admittedly, the
parable does seem to mean that Christianity, or "the
kingdom of heaven", has very small beginnings and
then grows to very great dimensions. There may be an
element of truth in that. The beginnings in Jerusalem WERE
small, and in the course of the centuries
Christianity has become worldwide. But is that just what
the Lord meant by the parable?
There are at least
three things that would pull us up and make us think
again, and think more energetically.
One is that at other
times the Lord definitely used terms of strict and severe
limitation in relation to salvation, the way and the
issue. So much was this so, that His disciples were
startled into ejaculating: "Lord, are there few that
be saved?" (Luke 12:23). He spoke of the way to life
being straitened, and few finding or accepting it: of the
gate being narrow, and few entering thereby (Matt.
7:13,14). He called His disciples (representatives of His
Church) the "little flock" to whom it would be
the Father's good pleasure to give THE KINGDOM (Luke
12:32). There are contrasting ideas between
"wide" and "narrow",
"broad" and "straitened", big and
little, popular and unpopular. All this does not agree
with the usual superficial interpretation of this
parable.
Then what about the
"fowls of the air"? Did He use this metaphor in
a contradictory way? In the parable of the sower He had
spoken of these in a bad sense: is He employing the same
terms in a right and proper sense here? This violates the
principle of consistency in inspiration.
Thirdly, is it COMMONLY
true that the "mustard seed", the smallest of
all, grows into a tree so great as is here depicted? No,
it is positively not true. If our Lord saw such a thing -
and He may have done - and drew attention to it, He was
drawing attention to something abnormal and not natural.
It was sufficiently abnormal and unnatural to attract
attention.
This brings us to the
factor that is common to ALL the parables and
all the teaching of Jesus, and of the Apostles
subsequently. In all these parables there is a selective,
discriminating, contrasting, comparative, good-and-bad
element. The Kingdom of Heaven is like that: the
sovereign rule is all-comprehending, but it is very
particular, selective, and judicial. Consistency in every
direction demands that we interpret this "tree"
of Christianity as an abnormal, unnatural development,
capable of housing many things that are not in keeping
with the true NATURE of the Kingdom. These
"fowls" are NOT the born-from-above
people who alone can see or enter the kingdom (John 3).
They are all the accretions, the camp-followers, the
parasites, the various kinds of people and things that
take advantages of Christianity, and use its cover, but
are not of its nature.
The Lord was letting
His disciples know that this is what would happen, and
that the sovereignty took all this in its stride. It is
as well that we should know that the Lord has foreseen
the developments of Christianity and its abnormalities,
but it is to great detriment that His spirit of
discernment and discrimination does not have a way with
so many Christians.
Does the New Testament,
to begin with, indicate that there is any such thing as
abnormality, or this kind of abnormal development, about
the true work of God? It rather indicates that, although
ultimately the sum of many, many centuries will be 'a
great multitude which no man can number', there will be,
as we get nearer and nearer to the end, a tremendous
sifting out and falling away. It is definitely stated
that that day will not come before there is a great
falling away (2 Thess. 2:3), and that "judgment must
begin at the house of God" (1 Pet. 4:17). Well,
then, if this is right - a great falling away - the Bible
contradicts itself. As we have said, the teaching of the
Lord seemed to be so clear to the disciples on this
matter that they exclaimed: "Are there few that be
saved?" What is all this about the broad and the
narrow way? The broad way - many go by it; the narrow way
- few find it. The Bible does not contradict itself; but
it says that God takes account of these things, and God
in His sovereignty permits them. He does not come out and
destroy this freakish thing popularly called
'Christianity'. That may be there, but God in His
sovereignty is pursuing His own course to secure what He
is after. Though all this may be quite true, the
sovereign rule of God goes on, the sovereignty is
preserved.
THE
PARABLE OF THE LEAVEN
The same principle is
implicit in the next parable.
"The kingdom of
heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid
in three measures of meal, till it was all leavened"
(v. 33).
(a)
THE LEAVEN
The popular
interpretation is that the leaven is Christianity:
Christianity being taken by the Church and put into the
world until the whole lump is leavened - the whole world
is 'leavened' with Christianity. It is suggested that we
shall see the world saved by the deep, silent movement of
Christianity, working strongly and deeply and hiddenly,
like leaven. It is easy to say that sort of thing, but it
is superficial reasoning. In the light of history, and in
the light of the Word of God, it is very difficult to
believe.
Look again. The
world-population is vastly more in excess of the
Christian population than at any time in the
dispensation. After these almost twenty centuries of
Christianity, an immense number over a very great part of
the world have never heard the Gospel yet. Look at this -
1,200 million out of the 2,000 million people of the
earth are still without the knowledge of Christ. Then
what of the unspeakable revelation of iniquity in
countries which have had the Gospel for centuries? We
could make an immense build-up of facts which would
shatter this interpretation of the leaven beyond
reconstruction.
What, then, is the
meaning of the leaven? I do not believe that leaven here
stands in a different category from leaven anywhere else
in the Bible. Consistency of Scripture demands that we
interpret leaven always as the same thing, in the same
light: and everywhere else in Scripture leaven is evil -
something that has to be purged out. In the old economy
they had to light their lamp on the eve of the Passover,
and search the house high and low, nook and cranny, for
any leaven and purge it out. The Passover could not be
eaten till it was certain that there was no vestige or
trace of leaven anywhere. They had to eat unleavened
bread in the Passover. The Lord Jesus spoke of "the
leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees" (Matt. 16:6)
and "the leaven of Herod" (Mark 8:15). And Paul
spoke of 'purging out the old leaven' (1 Cor. 5:7).
Everywhere it is something evil. The function or effect
of leaven is to disintegrate, to break up, to tear apart
- every housewife knows that. And it is not different
here: still it is leaven and still it is evil. If you say
that the Kingdom of Heaven, as a realm, is like that, you
are in trouble. But the sovereign rule of God knows all
about this deep, secret movement of disintegration, of
evil, that has come into the realm of Divine things. It
is not the Kingdom of Heaven that is like an alcoholic
fermentation, disintegration, putrefaction.
(b)
THE WOMAN
It is only necessary to
look at such passages of Scripture as Revelation 2:20-23
("the woman Jezebel"), and Revelation 17
("the great harlot") to realise that a
"woman" so often in the Bible is the symbol of
a system. Again and again it has been a woman, either
personally or symbolically, who has corrupted Divine
things, or brought corruption into relationship with
them. See Samson; see Solomon; see later kings for
examples. In the message to Thyatira, this insinuation of
evil and corruption into the House of God is the occasion
of the severest judgment - for it is called "the
deep things of Satan" (Rev. 2:24). What
foreknowledge and foresight our Lord had in these
parables! But let us go on.
(c)
THREE MEASURES
Three measures.
Remember that three is the number of Divine Persons and
Divine things. Evil has spread even through the Church,
so that within Christianity itself the very Divine
Persons have been subjected to questions and doubts. God
Himself - the Son, the Spirit - has been misrepresented.
With many other things of God, evil has come in to break
them up - to destroy their effectiveness and power by
destroying their solidity. What are you going to do about
it?
The sovereign rule of
God takes account of it - the working of evil, the
working of falsehood, the working of misrepresentation
and misinterpretation of the things of God. History is
just full of it, as we know. We hate using terms and
labels, but is it not just that which has happened in the
last hundred years in the realm called 'Modernism' or
'Liberalism'? Is it not the leaven disintegrating Divine
things? The very Person of Jesus Christ is stripped of
His Deity; the very Word of God is denied its authority
and its finality; the very Holy Spirit is degraded from
His dignity as a Divine Person; and so on. The Lord Jesus
discerned the future, saw the way things would go, and
spoke like this. He was saying. 'This very generation
will not be out before all sorts of heresies and errors
will come into the realm of Divine things' - which they
did.
But the sovereign rule
of God goes on. This does not spell God's confusion and
God's defeat. His sovereignty is greater than all this.
It is the only way really to be consistent both with the
teaching of Scripture and with history itself. Surely it
must be sheer blindness that reads history in any other
way. As I said, I am not expounding these parables, but
lifting out the point that is common to them all. From
various angles, for various and differing causes, in
differing situations, right down the age: whatever may be
permitted by that sovereignty, that sovereignty is equal
to it all, and will be fully vindicated in the end.
THE
PARABLE OF THE DRAG-NET
We reach the last
parable, that of the great dragnet let down into the sea
- the sea always speaking of humanity - and gathering a
great multitude of fishes. Yes, the sovereignty of God
does that: in comes the net, with its multitude of fishes
of all sorts, and then sovereignty gets to work and
separates the good from the bad, and in the end God has
what He was after from the beginning. He has got it at
last. That is how the sovereignty works. There is much
instruction here for Christians and for Christian
workers. If we had our way, we would go to work to see to
it that we always and only have the thing that is
absolutely and certainly and positively according to
God's mind: we would select that, and put a hedge round
it, and set up walls about it, and we would protect it
and keep it, as an exclusive company. But these parables
say, No! The sovereignty of Heaven does not do that sort
of thing. The sovereignty of Heaven permits and tolerates
very much that will ultimately be found to be not
according to Heaven. Yes, it takes account of much; but
it is driving its own course, and, in the end, through
all, God will have what He set His heart upon.
THE
COMPREHENSIVENESS OF THE RULE OF GOD
To sum up - see how
comprehensive is this rule of God. The sovereignty of God
is one of the most problematic and perplexing things to
Christians, in relation to what God will allow even in
association with His own work. We would not do that at
all. We would be very, very particular. But see how
comprehensive God is. He allows a very great deal. He not
only allows it - He even uses very much that perhaps we
would never use, or about which we would have a question.
He comes through things in His sovereignty to get His
ends. It is HIS END that is the great testimony to
His sovereignty. We say: How could God get anything out
of this, or out of that? Well, He does, that is all. How
could God get anything in that way? He just does! Look at
this, look at that, look at all these things: is anything
possible for God? The verdict at the end is that God
sovereignly did get something.
You see, this is the
great heart and core of this whole teaching and
revelation of the Kingdom of God. It does not mean that
you and I need not be sensitive to the Lord - that is
another thing altogether. We may come to that later, when
we say something about the Kingdom and the Church. It
does not mean that, because we see that God's sovereignty
reaches His ends in spite of everything, we are just to
be careless and insensitive to the mind of the Spirit; to
do all sorts of things that God, if He could have His
way, would not sanction. But it does mean that this
sovereignty of God is going to cover a lot of ground: it
is going to get its end through many, many ways and means
which in themselves, intrinsically, are not of Him. It is
this rule of the heavens that is, so to speak, 'getting
on with its job'.
We, left to ourselves,
are so fussy, so particular, that we would not leave room
for the sovereignty of God. The great appeal here is:
Leave plenty of room for God. That is what it amounts to.
Never despair over any situation as being finally and
utterly hopeless. In the presence of the spread of this
evil thing, this leaven - the expansion of this abnormal,
'freak' Christianity, with its contradictions and
disappointments - we are forbidden by this sovereignty to
give up and say it is a hopeless thing. We have to come
to the place where we say and believe and take our stand:
'That looks a pretty hopeless situation, but God can get
something out of it, and He will.'
That is the good news
of the Kingdom, the Gospel of the Kingdom. I know that
many of you who read these words can bear this out. You
have known the most awful and impossible situations of
mixture and hopelessness. You have despaired - and then
you have seen God do something. What a strength and force
that gives to the remainder of the statement! "This
gospel of the kingdom shall be proclaimed... for a
testimony unto all the nations". In His sovereignty,
God can turn the most unpropitious and unpromising
situation, the most hopeless state of things, into a
glorious testimony. Yes, He allows so much, but He
governs all. And He makes use of all manner of agencies -
even the Devil himself. That must be sovereignty!
"An enemy hath done this." Very well: we will
use the enemy to show what is right and what is wrong, to
make all the more manifest what is of God and what is
not. The work of the Devil shall be employed to that end.
That is the rule of Heaven.
All this is borne out
in the later New Testament. "The things which befell
me", writes Paul (Phil. 1:12) - what were they? They
were the Devil's work. Again - "We would fain have
come unto you, I Paul once and again; and Satan hindered
us" (1 Thess. 2:18). Strange, mysterious statement!
Yes, the Devil is busy; "a messenger of Satan"
(2 Cor. 12:7) - he is very active. And what is the
verdict at the end? "The things which befell me have
fallen out rather unto the progress of the gospel"!
Under the sovereignty of God the very works of the Devil
are being used to reach God's end.
Perhaps that is common
knowledge, so often said. But we must come more
definitely to this settled position, that GOD AND
CHRIST ARE ON THE THRONE. This Kingdom is a
present reality. There are many things which contradict
it and work against it. God does not consume and
annihilate them: He permits them, and then takes hold of
them; and the end is that His throne is established and
it is made manifest that "his kingdom ruleth over
all" (Ps. 103:19).
What these parables say
to us is this - that God faces facts and has no
illusions. He faces the fact that a large proportion of
the sowing of the word of the Kingdom will fail. He faces
the fact that Christianity will become an abnormal
conglomeration, without any distinctiveness of testimony.
He recognises that there will be a secret hidden working
of error, of evil, of falsehood, all to disintegrate. He
faces it all - all the work of the Devil, all the work of
evil, all the failure of man - and then He declares His
sovereignty over it all. That is what arises here. Let us
ask for strength to believe it.
GOD'S
JUDICIAL WORK
I have not said much
about another aspect of these parables: namely, that
there is a judicial, discriminatory work going on all the
time. Do not fail to see that. All through these
parables, He is cutting a line, He is discriminating, He
is acting judicially. God is not just saying, 'Everything
is all right - do not worry. Sit in your armchairs, ye
Christian men; sit down, the Kingdom is coming.' No;
rather - 'Rise up, ye men of God!' God is not passive,
indifferent, careless, saying, 'Oh, it will be all right,
this is all right; do not worry about it.' He is not like
that. He is acting, and will act, judicially. He is
really putting things in their place, and dividing
between, as He does with the churches in the Revelation.
He is discriminating. He is putting this here and that
there, and saying that they belong to two different
realms. That is a part of His sovereignty.
But our chief point is
this: The operation of the Kingdom, or the rule, of God
is to bring in at last the triumph of that rule. Whatever
else may come in, it means the triumph of that rule. The
rule of Heaven, the rule of God, comes out in the end
triumphant.
This is chapter 2
from the book "The Gospel of the
Kingdom" originally published in "A Witness and A Testimony" magazine, Mar-Apr 1961, Vol. 39-2.